Fuji XF 50-140 f2.8 WR vs Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VR II size comparison


Size Comparison between the Fuji XF 50-140mm f2.8 WR on X-Pro 1 ( 1.44 kg)

and Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR II on Df (2.64 kg)

_R011160 - Version 2 _R011162 - Version 2 _R011165 - Version 2 _R011166 - Version 2 _R011167 - Version 2

4 thoughts on “Fuji XF 50-140 f2.8 WR vs Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VR II size comparison

  1. when you want to compare a zoom lens to the fuji 50-140 2.8, it has to be a 70-200mm f4 on a full frame camera .. so, here the nikon 70-200mm f4 af-s vr is more relevant and it is a 850 grams … !!!

    Like

  2. Pingback: Fuji XF 50-140 f2.8 WR vs Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VR II size comparison | Fuji Source

  3. @ Gordon – both of the Nikon lenses mentioned (70-200 f/4 and 70-200 f/2.8) have built in stabilization. Not certain why you think the comparison is lopsided???

    Liked by 1 person

  4. A lop-sided comparison, especially if you are interested in the selective focus capability. A more reasonable comparison would be with the Nikkor 70-200 f4, which has image stabilization. At any given aperture, the Fuji would have to be at least one stop more open than the Nikon to achieve a comparable degree of background blur. Yes, the extra stop would allow a lower iso or faster shutter speed on the fuji, however that would be more than off-set by the VR.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s